<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Failing the crazy test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rossparker.com/2009/05/20/failing-the-crazy-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rossparker.com/2009/05/20/failing-the-crazy-test/</link>
	<description>business, finance and life from a London perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:09:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LemmusLemmus</title>
		<link>http://rossparker.com/2009/05/20/failing-the-crazy-test/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>LemmusLemmus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rossparker.com/?p=238#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Ross,

&quot;he&quot; is correct.

You haven&#039;t shown my summary of Rand&#039;s axiom is a straw man (nor have I shown it isn&#039;t - it&#039;s a summary, after all). It may well be that the only life Ayn Rand cared about was her own, but that clearly is not part of the argument &lt;i&gt;in that essay&lt;/i&gt;, which is all I&#039;m talking about. I hence stand by my claim that she&#039;s being inconsistent.

The way he word is usually used, happiness has a lot to do with quality of life, but she uses it in a very special meaning in that essay which I have a funny feeling you have not read recently.

You seem to have completely misread the last bit you quote. I said, or meant to say, that I could not have an opinion on Rand&#039;s body of work precisely because I wouldn&#039;t read any of her other stuff - the reason being that I&#039;m trying to allocate my time rationally, which means I will not read texts which I have to guess on the basis of experience will not yield a lot of utility for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ross,</p>
<p>&#8220;he&#8221; is correct.</p>
<p>You haven&#8217;t shown my summary of Rand&#8217;s axiom is a straw man (nor have I shown it isn&#8217;t &#8211; it&#8217;s a summary, after all). It may well be that the only life Ayn Rand cared about was her own, but that clearly is not part of the argument <i>in that essay</i>, which is all I&#8217;m talking about. I hence stand by my claim that she&#8217;s being inconsistent.</p>
<p>The way he word is usually used, happiness has a lot to do with quality of life, but she uses it in a very special meaning in that essay which I have a funny feeling you have not read recently.</p>
<p>You seem to have completely misread the last bit you quote. I said, or meant to say, that I could not have an opinion on Rand&#8217;s body of work precisely because I wouldn&#8217;t read any of her other stuff &#8211; the reason being that I&#8217;m trying to allocate my time rationally, which means I will not read texts which I have to guess on the basis of experience will not yield a lot of utility for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

